In the News:

January 2000
List questions and answers
here. Engineers Develop System To Assess Anthrax Threats
By Rachel Davis
Associate Editor
How do companies guard their
employees against an enemy they can't see? Over the last several
months, anthrax contamination reared its head at dozens of
sites in the U.S., resulting in the deaths of five people.
In this cautious environment, companies are seeking the right
level of response to protect their staff from possible biological
or chemical contamination in a way that's unobtrusive, yet
effective.
Two NSPE members from South
Dakota are helping employers with this dilemma by working
with an indoor air quality testing company to develop a threat-analysis
system to reduce the impact of biological and chemical attacks.
NSPE member and Professional
Engineer George Dunham received a telephone call from Gray
Robertson, president of Virginia-based Healthy Buildings International
Inc., shortly after the first case of anthrax was reported
in Florida on September 18. Robertson wanted Dunham's help
in coming up with a process that HBI could use to evaluate
the vulnerability of buildings to chemical and biological
attacks and propose appropriate solutions.
Dunham and Robertson, who have
been friends for 10 years, worked together on significant
air quality and ventilation projects for large companies in
the past. Dunham, who specializes in HVAC design, founded
the 41-year-old consulting engineering company Dunham Associates
Inc. with his wife and fellow NSPE member, Professional Engineer
Nancy Dunham. Although he retired and sold his interest in
the company in 1999, Dunham was willing to take on the threat-analysis
project.
NSPE members Steve Malone, P.E. (left), and
George Dunham, P.E., of South Dakota
"Obviously
you can't completely avoid a terrorist attack," says
Dunham. "So if it would happen to occur, then you need
to have steps in place [to] contain the spread of a contaminant
within a building."
Although Dunham and Robertson
outlined their threat-analysis plan in one day, they honed
the idea over the next few weeks. The beginning phase of the
plan, vulnerability assessment, is composed of several steps.
The first step, data gathering, involves collecting as much
physical data about the structure of the building as possible,
focusing on features such as the HVAC system and air filters,
vertical shafts, atria, and stairwells.
For the second step, Dunham
recruited NSPE member and Professional Engineer Steve Malone,
founder of South Dakota's Malone Engineering, to develop three-dimensional
computer models of airflow, using computational fluid dynamics
software to analyze various attack scenarios. Dunham had hired
Malone out of college and mentored him for about 15 years.
About the time Dunham retired, Malone started his own company.
The computer models can be
used to track the source of a contaminant and study how it
spreads within a building. For example, given the right parameters,
the software tracks how wind and thermal currents would carry
a contaminant and shows whether it would enter the inside
air intakes. Running a typical 3D model of airflow can take
more than 36 hours, Dunham says.
The third step is a physical
test, which involves releasing an inert "tracer"
gas in the building and using infrared photography and thermal
imaging to identify cracks or other deficiencies in the building
structure.
After the vulnerability assessment
is complete, the next step is to identify the problems and
propose solutions. HBI mechanical engineers could assess how
contaminants would get around the building, and then devise
methods to minimize and control contamination. This may involve
changing the direction of airflow or using sophisticated,
clean room-type filters to capture biological or chemical
hazards, Dunham says.
The threat-analysis system
has drawn the attention of several federal agencies, and there
appears to be significant consumer demand in HBI's future,
he says. The company is currently implementing its threat-analysis
plan for its first client, the Federal Reserve Bank system.
Depending on the building size
or complexity, the vulnerability assessment phase of the threat-analysis
system would cost a client $20,000 to $40,000, Dunham says.
"Once you've identified the problems, then solutions
cost more," he adds.
One of the problems with detecting
anthrax is that there are no means of immediately identifying
the bacteria without taking samples to a lab. This process
takes at least 24 hours, Dunham says. "Proper air filters
can go a long way toward preventing the spread of contamination
within a building. However, once you've trapped them in the
filters, you have to know they are there."
At 67 years old, Dunham has
temporarily come out of retirement to be integrally involved
with setting up the threat-analysis plan for HBI's first clients.
As for how long his involvement with the project will last,
he chuckles, "It's like dipping your toe into a swiftly
flowing river and trying not to get swept away."
|